The article starts with the point it is trying to make and then it delves into specifics of the incident. It lays out the defense's position and why the accident happened. Then it gives the result of the trial.
I think this is a good way to write this type of article. There's a hook to get the reader interested. Then it starts to fill in the details to make the reader understand. That is a good way to write an article. So many articles of this sort just lay out facts and give expert quotes and don't give out any of the author's opinions or analysis.
The biography of the author describes him as having his main interests in film and music. His past articles for The Guardian all seem to be in these fields. He seems to have a pattern of doing a more thorough analysis of his subjects.
No comments:
Post a Comment