The text works by presenting two or three points and then quoting someone on the issue to illustrate one of the points. It seems content to just present a few arguments and not give any analysis or opinions, which is typical of a newspaper article. So, it's just a presentation of facts without any analysis.
The idea is that there is an attempt to track down the police thugs who caused a riot at the summit. At first, the available evidence is inconclusive but then new evidence is presented.
The reasoning is political. My bias is against the police involved. I feel that the specific cops involved were the villains.
It's hard to determine how reliable the source are. The points have no references and there's no real background given to the quotes.
No comments:
Post a Comment